The seller sent me an inspection report for the FR5 we're considering. It is the advert with ticks beside powers on and moves. No named equipment identities, repair work or exclusions. I like the price, but I don't want our small-block handling plan resting on the optimism of somebody else's tick boxes.
Then price a proper condition assessment before collection if the seller permits it. Give the assessor the complete included-equipment list and known history. A warehouse check can be honestly described and still leave most of your questions unanswered.
What repair history have they actually supplied? Refurbished could cover quite a range of work. I would ask for the details rather than infer them from how clean the photographs look.
Cleaning and a replaced external cable, according to their technician. Earlier ownership records are unavailable. I have asked for the cable identification and the technician's work note.
And check what that inspection can reasonably cover in their available setup. You want its limits agreed before the assessor travels, not discovered when everyone is standing around a disconnected controller.
They allow a visit. Our assessor has asked them directly about the available setup and the included pendant. We haven't paid for collection or agreed a purchase.
Does your budget also include developing the block-handling job? A condition report on the package won't supply the fixture, tooling or operator handover you still need.
Yes, separate application allowance. I'm comparing this with another complete-package offer, not pretending the bare used arm price buys our finished bench. Assessor has the work note now and is defining the visit scope.