Did the layout owner have the old route description, or only the final accepted drawing requirement?
The new bracket layout loses a bench the old route still uses
AmaraCarter1035 · 26 Jun 2025, 04:32 UTC
19 replies
Only the final requirement and a cycle figure from before the bench, which makes the proposed saving look rather less mysterious
23 pointsThen reopen the layout assumption before everyone starts designing around the empty space. You can investigate whether the bench is needed without pretending the answer already exists
20 pointsWho knows what happens at that bench?
6 pointsThe fabricator calls it straighten and check, but the written route doesn't say what gets measured before he starts
5 pointsOur packing route once hid a whole inspection under tidy up, so I'd ask him to walk through a normal example in words, including what makes him decide it needs correction rather than assuming everyone means the same operation.
20 pointsCan quality identify the acceptance check he uses after correction, including the drawing revision?
13 pointsQuality says released flange height to assembly revision D, current job is F; they are comparing the changes before copying any of those numbers
5 pointsKeep the old fixture revision in that comparison too. The component drawing can change while the fixture is quietly altered at the bench
6 pointsFound fixture revision B in the old job packet, plus an unnumbered sketch for an extra stop, so we don't yet know which actual arrangement produced the accepted parts
11 pointsCan the old setter recognise the extra stop?
24 pointsHe's still here and recognised the sketch, says it was tried then removed because some brackets wouldn't seat; that's recollection, not a signed change record
21 pointsDid he say which samples would not seat? A difference between component batches could be useful to investigate, even if his memory cannot establish the final fixture configuration.
8 pointsHe remembers a different gusset supply, no batch number, so I'm keeping that as a question for the incoming-part review rather than writing it down as the cause
15 pointsWho owns the current-part review now, including the measurements before any correction?
25 pointsI'd have the fabrication and quality people define it together. A fixture designer alone shouldn't be left to guess both what arrives and what counts as an acceptable released bracket
9 pointsFabrication lead is organising it with quality and the fixture designer; purchasing has marked the cycle estimate provisional and the bench space stays in the planning comparison for now
20 pointsThanks for keeping the floor-plan answer provisional too.
12 pointsLet us know what the current samples show. I'm especially interested whether the seating concern repeats with known component identities, rather than only in the old setter's memory.
25 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .