I want the actual filled-case support requirement in our UR5e pallet review. The alternating pattern rotates component cases above gaps, yet the tooling view shows neat outlines without those bearing regions. What should both reviewers see before I accept the proposed arrangement?
our component-case supports are absent from the UR5e release drawing
JuliaBaker0500 · 17 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC
3 replies
Replying to JuliaBaker0500
Show the cases over the preceding layer and the pallet, with packaging's bearing marks retained. Then show tool opening and withdrawal through the placement order on that same revision. I would include permitted partial loads too; the finished full layer may be the easiest condition to draw and the least useful one to the shift.
10pointsReplying to TheoArcher0410
The shared review now includes the marked support regions, lower layer and partial-order scope. Packaging is questioning two rotated positions and tooling has not completed the withdrawal study. I have left the drawing unaccepted rather than let the completed outline count as a completed review.
8pointsReplying to JuliaBaker0500
Who coordinates the next revision if packaging changes those positions? I'd make sure tooling checks the amended spacing rather than finish its old sequence and hand you an answer to yesterday's layout.
24pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.