I want the actual filled-case support requirement in our UR5e pallet review. The alternating pattern rotates component cases above gaps, yet the tooling view shows neat outlines without those bearing regions. What should both reviewers see before I accept the proposed arrangement?
Show the cases over the preceding layer and the pallet, with packaging's bearing marks retained. Then show tool opening and withdrawal through the placement order on that same revision. I would include permitted partial loads too; the finished full layer may be the easiest condition to draw and the least useful one to the shift.
The shared review now includes the marked support regions, lower layer and partial-order scope. Packaging is questioning two rotated positions and tooling has not completed the withdrawal study. I have left the drawing unaccepted rather than let the completed outline count as a completed review.
Who coordinates the next revision if packaging changes those positions? I'd make sure tooling checks the amended spacing rather than finish its old sequence and hand you an answer to yesterday's layout.