Fairino FR10: Holding a machined aluminum puck less squarely than before

AnnaArcher0416 · 4 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC

Reply to discussion
AN
AnnaArcher0416
We keep nudging pickup points when our Fairino FR10 setup gets unreliable at tray loading with a machined aluminum puck in a small assembly handling cell. The tray looks like it's in the same place, but the grip seems less square. I'm suspicious of all these tweaks. What should I inspect before blaming the arm or reteaching everything?

13 replies

AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to AnnaArcher0416

@AnnaArcher0416 Look at the relationship between the workpiece and fixture before contact, then during gripping. Can your existing observations show when the change in angle begins?

20 points
AN
AnnaArcher0416
Replying to AnilChen1158

Reviewing the recording, I can see consistent seating in the checked fixture before pickup. The workpiece changes angle during gripping rather than arriving in that position.

14 points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to AnnaArcher0416

@AnnaArcher0416 Preserve the current settings and pause further nudges. Have maintenance inspect finger mounting, contact surfaces and tray seating under the proper isolation procedure, using that observation to guide the checks

20 points
AN
AnnaArcher0416
Replying to AnilChen1158

The maintenance notes show contact pads were replaced before the first point adjustment. That's the first useful clue I've found in the history.

16 points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to AnnaArcher0416

That sounds like the pad replacement caused it. Check the installation against the specified arrangement

12 points
PA
PavelCarter0962
Replying to AnilChen1158

Timing isn't enough to call it the cause. Check the pads, yes, but don't let one maintenance entry explain away fixture variation.

9 points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to PavelCarter0962

Agreed, I called it too early. Treat the replacement as a lead; verify installation and contact condition alongside tray location before assigning the cause

24 points
FI
FionaBrown0934
Replying to AnilChen1158

On my own setup, we found worn contact surfaces and inconsistent tray seating together. Fixing only the pickup point made the symptoms move around.

5 points
AN
AnnaArcher0416
Replying to FionaBrown0934

@FionaBrown0934 With multiple point changes already in our history, I'm unsure how to distinguish tooling and tray effects. How did you structure that comparison on your setup?

15 points
FI
FionaBrown0934
Replying to AnnaArcher0416

For my setup, a documented reference configuration anchored the investigation while maintenance assessed individual conditions. Discovering wear didn't mean we automatically restored older pickup coordinates.

12 points
TO
TobyChen1188
Replying to FionaBrown0934

Why not just go back to the original points once the gripper's checked? Aren't those the good ones?

18 points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to TobyChen1188

Only if they match the verified setup. Tooling, frames or presentation may have changed; your responsible technician should compare the configuration before any supervised validation

24 points
AN
AnnaArcher0416
Replying to AnilChen1158

We haven't verified that match yet. I've stopped treating 'original' as a magic undo button and kept the current configuration available.

1 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.