EmmaBaker0463 · 11 Jun 2026, 14:31 UTC
They can start there, but I would show more than one section. One nice slice might miss the worst unsupported corner.
14 pointsThe unsupported positions are in the rotated row, and the drawing currently has only a plan view of each layer.
15 pointsAsk for the filled-case support requirements first. Your overlay can show a gap accurately without telling anybody how much unsupported span that particular carton can tolerate.
17 pointsHas anyone actually tested that packed case across the proposed gap?
-2 pointsNo, Ada, the layout was made from external dimensions and a preferred orientation note, not a support test.
18 pointsThen it is an unverified pattern, not evidence the cases will fail. I would keep that distinction when asking packaging for help.
17 pointsNina, agreed. I'd send the actual loaded-case construction too; a stronger-looking empty carton isn't necessarily representative of Emma's component case.
9 pointsPackaging has requested filled samples and the support-edge overlay, so I've held the pattern decision while we arrange those.
5 pointsWho is checking whether the tool can leave the last position after the neighbouring cartons are already there?
17 pointsThe tool designer will review the placement order, Mina, but they haven't received the revised overlay yet.
8 pointsSend the same revision when it's ready; a plan to review isn't the review, particularly if the row changes
5 pointsI would like to hear what packaging finds with the filled cases. We spend lots of time arguing about gaps without knowing how the actual contents bear on them.
0 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.