The faceplate images have moving bright streaks and very confident scratch captions. I need physical references before UR5e commissioning, then capture conditions that don't confuse reflection with acceptance. Where should I start?
Identify the retained faceplates and have quality judge the physical regions under an agreed appearance method, then repeat presentation with those decisions attached; shifting a caption or reducing glare cannot itself decide whether a real surface mark is acceptable.
Quality reviewed the retained plates. One broad bright region is acceptable; a separate fine score fails their method. The candidate image adjustment suppresses both, so it's not our answer.
Keep that failed candidate with the marked regions and settings, then ask for a comparison that retains visibility of the rejected score across the intended presentation variation rather than merely producing a quieter image.
That's now the comparison request. No replacement capture results yet. I corrected the folder captions and left the unsuccessful setting visible as a rejected candidate, not a tuned inspection.