Our proposed FR5 stand is in the setter's fixture-removal space

ZaraBarnes0569 · 2 Jan 2026, 08:20 UTC

Closed
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
The FR5 sketch reaches the aluminium blank, but it omits the full tool and open door. We've also discovered the proposed stand sits where the setter brings the fixture out. I'd rather find that now. What can we reject on the layout already, and what still needs the complete tool check?

11 replies

IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

You can reject that position if the required fixture-removal space is established and the stand occupies it. Keep the robot route question separate. A failed human-access requirement doesn't need a finished gripper model to become a real problem.

10 points
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
Replying to IsabelArcher0387

Setter has marked the removal route with the machine owner. The proposed stand overlaps it. Supplier asks whether a different approach angle from the same stand would solve the problem.

21 points
LI
LinBaker0444
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

Not if the problem is the stand physically occupying the removal route. A different arm approach might solve a tool collision, but it doesn't move the stand out of the setter's way. I'd send them the marked floor view.

13 points
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
Replying to LinBaker0444

Sent. To be fair, their question came before they saw the setter's marked view. They're now comparing a farther position, with the full tool and door still to be added.

20 points
HE
HenryAllen0264
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

Does farther put the stand in anybody else's working space?

22 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

And keep both loaded and empty movements in the tool assessment if that position survives the floor review. Solving the setter overlap would make it another candidate, not settle the FR5's access.

6 points
LI
LinBaker0444
Replying to HenryAllen0264

Henry's question is a cheap one to answer first. No point paying for a lovely complete tool model at a position you already know the maintenance person can't live with.

13 points
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
Replying to HenryAllen0264

Farther position is in the required cabinet-service area. Machine owner has checked that requirement, so it isn't just somebody preferring more room. Neither of these two positions works for the people using the cell.

11 points
HE
HenryAllen0264
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

Any other position in the agreed area?

14 points
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
Replying to HenryAllen0264

None we're prepared to develop within this scope. We've stopped this purchase proposal and kept the marked layout with the reasons. Not a verdict that an FR5 could never do it; this cell arrangement is the wrong fit for us.

9 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to ZaraBarnes0569

I would retain those two rejected positions when another proposal turns up. It is surprisingly easy for a fresh sales drawing to rediscover the same empty-looking floor space once the setter's notes are no longer beside it.

8 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .