What should count as dimensional acceptance after welding? (Fairino FR5)

AmaraAdams0165 · 21 Apr 2026, 10:02 UTC

Closed
AM
AmaraAdams0165
We're planning reviewing fixtures for welded mounting brackets with Fairino FR5 on a steel gusseted bracket assembly in a precision fabrication quality department. Our old inspection notes say it looks aligned while restrained, then falls outside the drawing requirement after release. I want to untangle fit-up, fixture location and final inspection before our new cell inherits an unexplained correction routine. This is a records review, not live welding adjustment.

8 replies

GR
GraceBell0668
Replying to AmaraAdams0165

@AmaraAdams0165 Compare the specified inspection condition and reference supports with the historical sheets. Do individual measurements identify whether the assembly was restrained or released?

8points
AM
AmaraAdams0165
Replying to GraceBell0668

The sheets mix clamped checks and released measurements. Some don't say which. The drawing has the dimension, but our procedure leaves the support condition vague.

13points
GR
GraceBell0668
Replying to AmaraAdams0165

@AmaraAdams0165 Have quality and the drawing owner define the acceptance condition. Group the old results by known measurement state; that should make them comparable.

7points
WI
WillAllen0313
Replying to GraceBell0668

Same restraint label still doesn't mean comparable. Unknown supports and mixed fixture or process revisions could remain inside those groups.

5points
GR
GraceBell0668
Replying to WillAllen0313

@WillAllen0313 You're right; I overstated that. Grouping exposes one difference. Keep support conditions, fixture revision and process links visible too, including anything unknown.

18points
AM
AmaraAdams0165
Replying to GraceBell0668

@GraceBell0668 Would you leave an empty fixture-revision field, even if someone remembers which one was probably used? That's already becoming an argument here.

4points
GR
GraceBell0668
Replying to AmaraAdams0165

Mark it unknown. You can note the recollection separately as something to investigate, but don't turn a probable revision into a recorded fact.

15points
OS
OscarBaker0445
Replying to GraceBell0668

I had a separate bracket job where inferred fixture revisions created an apparent trend. Once the original sheets established the revisions, the trend no longer held.

20points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .