@IsabelAdams0126 We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it.

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

@IsabelAdams0126 The repeated arrangement remains a candidate, not an accepted solution. Its support and load stability still need assessment for the cartons with their actual contents.

@AlexBrooks0820 Agreed; I meant a comparison option. Packaging must assess both arrangements with the specified cartons and contents, including support and stability.

Doesn't alternating the carton directions strengthen a stack, or is that assumption too general here?

Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

The layer overlay shows carton edges above gaps below. That gives me something specific to mark for packaging instead of saying the pattern feels wrong.

I had a separate dispatch setup where the carton top view omitted the pallet's deck gaps. Including the deck geometry exposed additional positions for packaging assessment.

Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin.

Specify the deck arrangement as well as the footprint. Two pallets with the same outside size needn't provide the same support underneath.

@RosaAbbott0031 For access, show the whole tool beside neighbouring cartons at the corner placements. The centre mark won't reveal body or finger overlap.

@IsabelAdams0126 The tool outline overlaps the next carton at one corner in our offline layout. Lovely rectangles, inconvenient gripper. I'll flag that position for the integrator.

@RosaAbbott0031 Include approach and release, not just the final pose. Clearing the outline at the destination wouldn't establish access to it.

I'll keep that review offline and include every layer. I'm not going to explore the corner with manual jogging.

Should an incomplete final layer be included in the pattern drawings, or is the full-layer review sufficient?

@ZaraBrown0917 Any partial layers permitted by the process belong in the review. The packaging assessment needs to cover the resulting loads that dispatch may actually receive.

The pattern remains unaccepted because its tidy carton arrangement hasn't established the required support and handling access.

@RosaAbbott0031 Your reason for holding the pattern is clear: its arrangement hasn't established the support and access required by the cell.