Cannot select our FR10 pattern around a support sheet nobody stocks
CallumCarter0969 · 15 Feb 2026, 19:19 UTC
18 replies
Compare each complete arrangement using the same packed carton and order mix. The sheet-free candidate still needs its own support and tool-withdrawal check; removing the sheet alone does not establish a workable pattern.
12pointsWe have a lower-count straight arrangement. Packaging has its section and tooling has the same version. The sheet supplier enquiry is still open.
1pointsDid anyone specify that sheet from an actual product, or is it an ideal material someone drew? We had to settle that before our own comparison stopped drifting.
5pointsAlso check partial builds. The complete straight layer may support cartons differently from a short order stopped midway.
2pointsI'd give the supplier enquiry a sensible decision point, not let it hold the whole exercise indefinitely. But price the extra pallet movements on the straight option too. It has its own inconvenience.
10pointsElliot, packaging named a material specification but no supply product. Lin, dispatch is costing actual orders. Hana, partial builds are included. We agreed to decide after those returned checks, rather than keep extending the sheet search.
15pointsThat is clearer. Could a different available sheet be assessed, or is the required support very particular?
20pointsAny substitute should go back to packaging and tooling as a changed candidate. A similar-looking sheet could change both support and the way it is handled.
8pointsPackaging will assess an available alternative. Tooling says its handling method also changes with that sheet. We have not put its lower material price straight into the original proposal.
15pointsGood. A cheap sheet plus a new feeding job is not necessarily a cheaper sheet option.
15pointsWho replenishes the proposed sheet supply during ordinary operation?
12pointsThe packer, with a separate stack at the station. Dispatch included replenishment and the extra movement in the labour comparison. It is not covered by the original robot cycle time.
13pointsAny result on straight-row support yet?
2pointsPackaging accepted its support for our packed carton and assessed builds. Tooling confirmed withdrawal with the proposed fingers. The available-sheet alternative still has an unfinished feed arrangement.
14pointsHow much worse is the straight option on actual dispatch work, rather than cartons per layer?
10pointsMore pallets on our larger orders, but less intervention on short orders. Dispatch says the total work is manageable and has included the freight difference.
8pointsThen you have a complete candidate to decide on. Do not let an unfinished higher-count option keep its nominal cycle time while leaving its operator work blank.
6pointsWe selected the straight arrangement. Extra pallet cost remains visible; sheet option is shelved, not quietly approved for later. Thanks, Elliot, for asking whether the first sheet was something anybody could actually buy.
0pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .