MayaBarnes0562 · 18 Dec 2025, 03:52 UTC
Which decision does your trainer need to explain at that branch?
22 pointsGet the missing call first. You can spend ages making a lovely contents page around a hole.
18 pointsSam, whether the bracket stays in the fixture or goes to the reject position.
13 pointsOur old fixture notes described a reject pocket that had been removed. The routine name survived, which made the notes look more useful than they were. Ask them to identify the actual destination and the fixture version while they explain the call.
-5 pointsDoes the choice depend on the inspection result alone, or does another ordinary input affect it?
19 pointsCould the integrator show the caller and called routine together in a review before you buy documentation work?
15 pointsRobin, yes, but somebody needs to capture the explanation. Watching them click around once won't give the next trainer much.
5 pointsThere's a destination-available input too. That's missing from our notes, and the integrator will review the branch with us.
6 pointsThat makes the destination drawing worth having beside the program. Who owns the availability signal?
7 pointsJane, I meant a review to find the missing material, not to replace written notes.
2 pointsPlease include the unavailable case in the explanation; that is where a trainer may otherwise invent an answer.
6 pointsAnd don't let the explanation finish at 'it waits'. Waits where, showing what? Those are the bits people actually ask about.
12 pointsCarla, the fixture PLC owns it. We now have both routines and their revisions, plus the signal list; the unavailable screen still needs explaining.
20 pointsJane and Sam, your wait question caught a blank in the trainer sheet. Left it visibly unfinished, cheers.
20 pointsHas someone been assigned to complete that screen explanation?
23 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .