Why did I call my prepared FR10 trial an easy setup?

I can replace easy setup with easy to follow during the prepared exercise. The placement view was clear to me, and that is the part I actually used.

Was it clear before he explained it, or clear with his explanation? Both useful, different experience.

Clear after his explanation, Oliver. I asked which frame the point belonged to, and he showed me. I had left that out because it felt like a beginner detail. It was a beginner trial.

That frame question belongs in it. Another beginner may find it more useful than a confident adjective.

One enclosure sat in the wrong tray pocket. He stopped the exercise and explained the pocket order before I reloaded it. I did not diagnose or recover the job alone.

There is your review getting more useful while becoming less flattering. Quite efficient editing, really.

I would not necessarily call it less flattering. It describes learning rather than an unsupported setup claim. You can retain the parts that genuinely worked well for you.

Lin's right. Nobody sensible expects a first visitor to know the tray convention by telepathy.

Revised opening now says supervised trial with prepared tooling, trays and program. The point-edit paragraph includes his frame explanation. The wrong-pocket interruption stays in too.

Does your title still say setup in ten minutes? Titles tend to survive after the paragraphs have confessed everything.

It did. Changed to First supervised enclosure-transfer trial on FR10. That ten minutes was time using the prepared exercise, not setting up the cell.

And your photo caption? I have been caught by that little refuge for obsolete claims.

Oliver, captions are worth checking, but we needn't make Owen rewrite every neutral sentence as a qualification. The aim is a clear account, not a review nobody can read.

Agreed. I meant the caption if it repeats the setup claim, not a warning label on every photo.

Caption did say my first program. It now says selecting the prepared program, because that is what the photo shows. Other captions were ordinary descriptions and I've left them alone.

Correction is posted. I still say I enjoyed the trial and found the placement view understandable after explanation. Thanks Yasmin; writing down my actual actions was easier than trying to invent a perfectly cautious adjective.

That's a review I'd trust more. It tells me what I could reasonably expect from a similar assisted visit.