IsabelBell0648 · 17 Oct 2025, 07:23 UTC
Have quality examine that bezel before keeping either scratch label, and retain the seating views too because they may explain why the line moves without telling you whether the part is acceptable.
21 pointsQuality accepted the physical bezel under their inspection method. I removed both defect labels from the teaching set. The line is still useful to show the students, just not as a confirmed scratch.
19 pointsThat sounds useful for teaching uncertainty, but do you also have a rejected physical sample to show what the intended inspection must find?
23 pointsNot yet. We have photographs of rejects, but their parts are gone. I have asked quality to retain a current rejected bezel and explain the judgement with the sample in front of us.
20 pointsKeep that request separate from the seating problem, Isabel, so waiting for a rejected sample doesn't leave the presentation differences unexplained.
24 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .