Our alternating FR10 dispatch pattern rotates some shipping cartons over gaps in their preferred support direction. I want the packed-carton bearing requirements and full tool release shown together, not separate approvals of separate drawings. What should each reviewer mark on that combined view?
Packaging should identify required bearing regions and allowed support arrangements; tooling should show occupied space through placement, release and withdrawal with neighbours already present, using the same carton and layer revision
That is now the joint request, Mei. Packaging has the actual packed sample but hasn't defined the required regions yet, so the integrator is retaining those as missing inputs rather than choosing a new pattern for them