LuisArcher0434 · 29 Dec 2025, 02:34 UTC
Correct the buying update and link the actual review inputs, because people will act on the selected status long before they notice the missing gripper.
15 pointsThe buyer used an early supplier image in a newer summary; I've asked for the current complete-tool reference and under-review status to replace it.
11 pointsDoes that summary authorise spending, Luis, or is it only an internal progress picture? The correction may need to reach someone outside the project team.
10 pointsIt was attached to a request for the stand price, not an order; the supplier has been told the position is not selected and the route assessment remains open.
15 pointsGood. Ask the integrator what is actually blocking its result now, rather than sending the whole tool package again as though it had never arrived.
12 pointsIt is checking the empty exit at the handle; the loaded entry is already represented, but no complete route has been accepted.
5 pointsThen have the price request state that dependency. A provisional price can be useful without becoming permission to fabricate a stand for an unfinished route.
11 pointsThe revised price request carries that condition and the current drawing references; stand manufacture is not authorised, and we are waiting for the empty-exit result.
16 pointsHas that result arrived, Luis, or is purchasing still working with a conditional price?
23 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .