Cover reject labels without a finish revision

Both are in the proposed job list, but our sample labels don't distinguish them and one supplier image doesn't identify a physical cover at all.

Give each intended finish its own identified examples, because our recent comparison needed representative finishes as well as the difficult reject; one attractive supplier image cannot stand in for both.

Can somebody match the retained covers to their incoming job records?

Yes, incoming records identify the two retained sets; quality is examining them separately and the unidentified supplier image is out of the working reference set.

Keep the faint real defect in the lighting comparison when quality identifies it, because on ours reducing the stripe also made the edge scuff too faint to use.

Has quality identified a rejected feature for each relevant finish, or are those decisions still pending?

They've identified a scratch on one finish and accepted the retained examples of the other; we still need a suitable reject for that second finish before calling the set representative.

And keep that gap explicit in the trial scope, otherwise a result for the first finish tends to acquire an everyone-knows-they're-similar extension.

Second-finish reject now retained and judged by quality; both finish groups are going into the presentation comparison, with the original unidentified photo kept only in the correspondence archive.

Who keeps those reference covers apart after people finish handling them?