the sheet option adds another changeover

NoahBrooks0803 · 2 Nov 2025, 04:37 UTC

Closed
NO
NoahBrooks0803
We kept a simpler carton pattern alongside the sheet proposal. Now our FR10 review includes sheet storage, replenishment and a second carton size. The capacity advantage looks less obvious. Which work belongs in that comparison?

16 replies

MA
MayaBarnes0562
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

Is the sheet specified yet, or are people costing a generic one?

6 points
NO
NoahBrooks0803
Replying to MayaBarnes0562

Still generic. Packaging is comparing candidates. I know that leaves the cost provisional; I want the work list ready.

2 points
JU
JuliaBrown0935
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

Include bringing sheets to the station and dealing with the leftovers at product change. Easy to count a replenishment from a stack placed beside the tool. Less easy when somebody has to fetch that stack and find a home for the previous size

17 points
SA
SamBrooks0855
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

Could you compare the two carton sizes separately first? I would rather see one useful case and one poor case than an average which convinces nobody who actually handles either product.

3 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to JuliaBrown0935

Yes. And show who changes the sheet stack, not just how long the arm waits

9 points
EL
ElliotBell0683
Replying to SamBrooks0855

Noah, are the two sizes changed during a shift or run in separate batches?

6 points
PA
PavelBennett0701
Replying to JaneBaker0510

We kept two similar consumables in adjacent bins and still managed to issue the wrong one. Different sizes may be obvious, but I would ask receiving how the proposed sheets will be identified before assuming the operator can tell.

22 points
NO
NoahBrooks0803
Replying to ElliotBell0683

Separate batches, Elliot, sometimes both in one shift. Sam, yes, separate comparisons make sense. Our smaller carton is most of the work and barely gains anything from the sheet pattern.

4 points
GA
GabrielAdams0105
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

We nearly let a clever rare-case fixture dictate our everyday job. I'd keep the simple pattern prominent for that smaller carton. You can still find out whether the larger one earns the extra handling without making it everyone's default

9 points
SA
SamBrooks0855
Replying to GabrielAdams0105

Gabriel, agreed, though the shared changeover effort still belongs somewhere. Noah, how would you show a shift which switches between the two instead of running either all day?

12 points
JU
JuliaBrown0935
Replying to SamBrooks0855

As a separate mixed-shift example, I reckon. Keep the per-product results readable, then show what switching adds. Include interrupted sheet replenishment too, if that ends up part of the assessed method

10 points
MA
MayaBarnes0562
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

And hold the support decision open while packaging compares those sheet candidates.

9 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to PavelBennett0701

Pavel, good point about stores. Big and small stops helping when two suppliers trim them differently

9 points
NO
NoahBrooks0803
Replying to JuliaBrown0935

Thanks Julia, mixed shift is the missing example. I've added fetching and returning sheet stock. The smaller-carton option stays sheet-free for comparison; nothing selected until support and tool access are reviewed.

17 points
PA
PavelBennett0701
Replying to JaneBaker0510

Jane, exactly. Our bin names outlived the parts they originally described. Noah may have perfectly distinct sheets; I just wouldn't let our sort of vague stock name become the proposed instruction.

2 points
EL
ElliotBell0683
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

Noah, who deals with leftover cartons when the shift changes size before finishing a pallet?

13 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .