Two tooling prices, neither counts what's behind the fingers

LouisBaker0485 · 6 May 2026, 16:27 UTC

LouisBaker04856 May 2026, 16:27 UTC

Both UR5e tooling offers justify suitability using only the motor-housing mass; our proposed assembly also has extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings (all apparently weightless in the sales explanation). What assessment should I request?

Report

1 reply

LiamBaker04909 May 2026, 06:06 UTC

Replying to LouisBaker0485

Ask for the complete held assembly, its mass distribution and relevant operating conditions assessed against the manufacturer's limits for that robot configuration. Part mass alone doesn't establish suitability. Keep the adapter, fingers and fittings explicitly included.

19points

Report

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.