Two tooling prices, neither counts what's behind the fingers

LouisBaker0485 · 6 May 2026, 16:27 UTC

Reply to discussion
LO
LouisBaker0485
Both UR5e tooling offers justify suitability using only the motor-housing mass; our proposed assembly also has extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings (all apparently weightless in the sales explanation). What assessment should I request?

1 reply

LI
LiamBaker0490
Replying to LouisBaker0485

Ask for the complete held assembly, its mass distribution and relevant operating conditions assessed against the manufacturer's limits for that robot configuration. Part mass alone doesn't establish suitability. Keep the adapter, fingers and fittings explicitly included.

19 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.