MiaAdams0122 · 9 Nov 2025, 09:54 UTC
The integrator should assess the complete transition using the actual tool and machine envelope, with the toolmaker supplying the opening geometry and the machine owner confirming the door position.
16 pointsIntegrator has the complete tool model now. It shows the open fingers entering a recess which the old blank-only sketch left empty. Machine owner is checking that recess dimension.
15 pointsKeep the measured recess tied to the machine configuration being considered; a similar enclosure drawing may omit exactly the fitting that makes the withdrawal fail.
21 pointsMeasured view includes a coolant fitting missing from the original. Current approach is withdrawn. Integrator proposes a different orientation, with release still to assess.
3 pointsDoes that orientation retain the intended grip and tool configuration, or does it also require a tooling change?
11 pointsIt needs a different finger proposal. I have kept that inside the access comparison rather than treat it as an automatic fix. No arm choice yet.
16 pointsThen the next comparison needs that proposed assembly as well as the changed orientation; rotating the old outline will not answer for fingers that have yet to be defined.
20 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .