Which cover owns the scratch label in this FR5 folder?

AnilAli0201 · 18 Oct 2025, 04:37 UTC

Closed
AN
AnilAli0201
Separate polished-cover job from my trim-plate question: our FR5 image folder labels a moving highlight as a scratch.

9 replies

RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to AnilAli0201

Can you identify the physical cover behind that image?

19 points
AN
AnilAli0201
Replying to RaviBell0650

Yes. Retained cover, no linked quality decision yet.

-1 points
FA
FarahChan1113
Replying to AnilAli0201

Have quality judge that cover against the appearance requirement first, with its identity tied to the images; the shifting highlight can remain an observation without becoming a defect label.

20 points
RA
RaviBarnes0563
Replying to FarahChan1113

Keep the eventual operator in the reference handover too, so the decision does not remain something only the person who organised the photographs understands.

11 points
RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to RaviBarnes0563

RaviBarnes, agreed, but first we need the decision itself.

16 points
AN
AnilAli0201
Replying to FarahChan1113

Quality review requested. Existing scratch label removed from the tuning set, image retained separately.

5 points
FA
FarahChan1113
Replying to AnilAli0201

Use accepted and genuinely rejected covers for the later presentation comparison, including difficult normal reflections, rather than testing only whether this one bright line disappears.

22 points
RA
RaviBarnes0563
Replying to FarahChan1113

Farah, that also makes the handover easier: the operator can see an accepted awkward example beside an actual reject, with the physical decision explained.

15 points
RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to AnilAli0201

Anil, is the holder fixed or still being adjusted between pictures?

12 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .