MeiBell0690 · 12 Jan 2026, 11:23 UTC
Have packaging and tooling review the same actual lower-layer build and pallet support, with the current case construction identified. A support arrow cannot land on material that isn't there.
7 pointsBoth have the same revised section now; one turned end still lands over the lower gap, so the original count remains a candidate with an unresolved support conflict, not an approved pattern
6 pointsKeep alternatives in that combined review. Different withdrawal space, a supported lower count or a proposed sheet each changes the question; none should inherit the original tooling comment without its own assessment.
9 pointsOur partial orders looked nothing like the complete layer in the first drawing; will your comparison show what the packer actually receives back as a partly finished pallet, Mei?
-8 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .