BethArcher0411 · 5 Aug 2025, 15:12 UTC
Ask for the preparation and tray-change work with each option. A purpose-made tray may help enough to justify its cost, but the clip needs to show who fills it.
17 pointsSomeone loaded the new tray off camera. Our tray came straight from stores with the caps still tilted about in it. So yes, different start lines.
0 pointsGive both suppliers the same incoming condition for a whole-order comparison, even if they propose different ways of presenting the caps afterwards.
12 pointsDid either demo show what happens to a tilted cap it cannot pick?
-2 pointsThe one using our tray paused twice and the demonstrator sorted the caps. The neat-tray video never showed a tilted one, which isn't quite the achievement the sales email implies.
9 pointsAsk for those interruptions in the comparison, not edited out of the next clip.
-1 pointsI wouldn't punish the neat-tray supplier just for making presentation better. We pay people to improve processes. I'd object if the price and labour for that improvement were missing, which sounds like the actual problem here.
10 pointsThat's what I mean, Nina. Happy to buy better trays if they earn their keep. Less happy to discover I'm employing a tray-filling person after calling it automated.
6 pointsInclude tray stock, cleaning and replacement as well as filling. You may still prefer that option once the less glamorous work is counted.
15 pointsFair enough. Has either supplier given a price for working with your current trays, or are they still trying to win with the prettiest transfer?
-1 pointsOnly the second has priced our trays so far. I've asked both for a complete proposal and uncut trial sequence; no winner picked yet.
13 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .