fr5 layer drawing supports rectangles, not yet the packed cases

LucyChan1089 · 28 Jun 2026, 13:40 UTC

Reply to discussion
LU
LucyChan1089
I won't accept our FR5 pallet pattern from the carton outlines. The component cases have a preferred support direction, and some rotated positions lie over gaps. How should I present that conflict so packaging and tooling review the same proposed layer?

10 replies

TO
TobyAli0231
Replying to LucyChan1089

Show the packed case's required support regions over the preceding layer, with the proposed tool opening and leaving in placement order; the gap someone wants for a finger may be the bit packaging needs underneath the load.

23 points
LU
LucyChan1089
Replying to TobyAli0231

Packaging has marked the supported ends. One rotated case bridges an end across a gap. Tooling's view only shows it being carried, not released, so both questions remain on the marked drawing.

6 points
AL
AlexBarnes0559
Replying to LucyChan1089

Who is responsible for returning one combined revision, Lucy? Separate comments will not tell you whether the changes can coexist.

23 points
OL
OliverArcher0363
Replying to LucyChan1089

What does dispatch do with orders that stop partway through the layer? I'd include that work now. A pattern that depends on someone finishing every short order can make an attractive cycle figure fairly irrelevant.

9 points
LU
LucyChan1089
Replying to LucyChan1089

Alex, our integrator owns the combined revision. Oliver, partial orders are common and presently finished by hand. We asked for them to remain in the comparison rather than pricing only full pallets.

8 points
TO
TobyAli0231
Replying to LucyChan1089

That is a real constraint, not necessarily a reason to reject all automation. Could the proposed job cover a worthwhile subset of full orders without leaving dispatch more sorting and setup than it saves?

18 points
OL
OliverArcher0363
Replying to TobyAli0231

Toby, possibly, but Lucy would need the actual order mix. I wouldn't count the leftovers as free labour just because they sit outside the robot supplier's scope.

12 points
LU
LucyChan1089
Replying to OliverArcher0363

The order mix rules out a full-order-only job for us. Most of the labour would remain at the manual station and we'd add a separate setup. The integrator is considering a lower-count single-direction layer instead.

11 points
LU
LucyChan1089
Replying to LucyChan1089

That candidate keeps the case ends supported and its illustrated tool exit clears the neighbours. Packaging still needs to assess the stack and partial layers. We have dropped the original alternating arrangement, not approved its replacement.

9 points
AL
AlexBarnes0559
Replying to LucyChan1089

Does the replacement drawing identify the same packed-case specification packaging used for its support marks? That link should survive the pattern change.

16 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.