Why are 111 UR5e fixture kits now being described as loose pieces?
MayaBennett0736 · 21 Jun 2026, 19:01 UTC
16 replies
Build the comparison by item. Required blocks from the confirmed kit contents, counted blocks received, then the difference. Keep the invoice and final message attached so the calculation doesn't silently replace the agreement.
9pointsThat is the distinction I need. I have a receiving count already. The seller is repeating the invoice quantity as total pieces without addressing the per-kit contents message.
15pointsOur receiving photos helped on a different missing-package search. Yours can support the condition and count, but they won't explain what the seller meant by pieces. Keep both questions visible rather than asking the photographs to do all the work.
18pointsHow many complete kits can the bench actually use, Maya? Tell planning that count separately from the number of loose accessories received
2pointsRavi, yes, provided incomplete kits stay identifiable. Otherwise someone borrows a block for today's job and the next receiving check appears to find a different shortage.
13pointsWe have separated complete and incomplete kits. I am not posting the receiving totals here, but the seller has the item-level count and photos against 111 required locating blocks.
11pointsThat's enough for the forum discussion. Ask the seller to show how their interpretation reconciles with one block per kit. They need to answer the particular line, not simply repeat that the outer box was sealed.
2pointsNathan, agreed. Sealed describes what Maya received. It doesn't tell either side whether the packing list or the agreed contents was followed.
18pointsKeep the usable-kit number with the planner too. The commercial argument won't prepare the next fixture changeover
21pointsWould purchasing accept a partial supply while the quantity dispute continues? That may be useful, but it should not become acceptance of the seller's interpretation by accident.
24pointsThe seller has offered additional blocks but fewer than our recorded shortage. No explanation of the remaining difference. Purchasing wants the offer itemised before deciding whether to accept a partial supply.
11pointsThen retain the full shortage and show their offered quantity against it. A partial offer is worth considering without rewriting what the original kit description required.
7pointsIs the offer for the same identified locating block, Maya? I'd check that before the discussion moves entirely to numbers.
13pointsThe message uses the same block description but no drawing reference. I have asked them to identify it against the original order. Thanks Leah, that was missing from my reply.
15pointsThey have now confirmed the original block reference for the partial offer. The balance is still disputed, and no dispatch has been confirmed. Our incomplete kits remain marked as such.
-2pointsUseful clarification on identity. Leave purchasing's decision on the partial offer separate from confirmation of supply; neither a reference nor an offer puts the blocks on the bench.
24pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.