Different packing line from my earlier sheet question; these component cases bridge gaps after rotation. I want support and tool access assessed together before pricing an FR10 pattern. Which views should I request?
On a previous review, transparent layer overlays made a misleading top view much easier to question. Request adjoining layers with the required support regions marked, plus sections where those regions cross gaps. The packaging reviewer still has to judge what the filled cases can tolerate.
Has anyone suggested changing the case itself? If so, keep that option separate from moving the present case. Purchasing would need to know which component orders could actually use the new packaging.
MinaArcher, would you ask for a whole second pattern now, before packaging has explained the current support requirement? That sounds like quite a bit of work on an option they may not need.
No, I meant establish whether that suggestion exists before it disappears into the price. A second full design can wait. A carton change is not something the drawing supplier should quietly assume purchasing can absorb.
And check which case their sample tool drawing uses, because if it's the proposed bigger one your current-case access question may still be sitting there unanswered