GabrielAli0192 · 28 Feb 2026, 22:30 UTC
Not the exchange route you need. Ask for the measured normal opening and the full held tool, opening fingers and empty return in the same model. Include the setter's fixture-removal space before choosing the stand.
13 pointsWe have a machine survey. Can the integrator use that instead of this brochure outline?
17 pointsYes, after checking it matches the actual machine and door arrangement. A survey can also be old or describe another configuration; have the machine owner settle that with the integrator.
12 pointsMachine owner confirmed the survey. Sent it with the complete tool drawing; stand choice remains provisional.
6 pointsKeep the gripped blank length and position in that request. The full tool alone still leaves out the piece crossing the doorway.
22 pointsDo you have one agreed grip position, Gabriel?
-2 pointsA proposed range. The drawing shows its two extremes, not one agreed point.
13 pointsThen ask for that range to be assessed, or for the proposal to state a narrower accepted range; otherwise the operator inherits freedom the layout never checked.
19 pointsYes. Both extremes are already in the request; no favourite middle position substituted.
13 pointsThe integrator should determine what coverage establishes access across the proposed range, rather than assuming two clear end views prove every connecting case clears too.
16 pointsCould a narrower grip range still handle your ordinary blanks?
4 pointsTooling is checking that option. No narrower range accepted yet, and no returned full-route result.
13 pointsThat belongs in the buying comparison as an unresolved constraint. Don't let a price based on the narrow range arrive looking more complete than the access work behind it.
16 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .