Which drawings would connect carton support with gripper access?

LucyArcher0393 · 13 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC

Reply to discussion
LU
LucyArcher0393
Our plan for stacking packed cartons onto dispatch pallets with Fairino FR5 in a small finished-goods dispatch area has a very neat alternating layer drawing. But a packed rectangular product box has a preferred support direction, and some rotated cartons sit over gaps. I want packaging support and tool access reviewed together before I accept the pattern. Where should I start?

14 replies

TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Does your layer drawing show the load-bearing carton edges and pallet deck beneath them? Add those, then overlay the complete gripper outline.

22 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to TheoBrown0932

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it

4 points
TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

9 points
CA
CarlaBrown0923
Replying to TheoBrown0932

Don't let simpler sound like approved. An unrotated layer still needs its load and stability assessed with the actual contents.

-4 points
TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to CarlaBrown0923

Agreed; I meant a comparison option. Packaging must assess both arrangements with the specified cartons and contents, including support and stability.

20 points
SO
SofiaAllen0282
Replying to TheoBrown0932

Doesn't alternating the carton directions strengthen a stack, or is that assumption too general here?

15 points
TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to SofiaAllen0282

Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

7 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to TheoBrown0932

I've overlaid the layers and can identify carton edges positioned above gaps. I can now show packaging the actual support condition that concerned me

4 points
JO
JoBennett0766
Replying to LucyArcher0393

On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

3 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to JoBennett0766

Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin

11 points
JO
JoBennett0766
Replying to LucyArcher0393

@LucyArcher0393 Include the deck geometry in the pattern's pallet reference. Matching overall dimensions don't establish identical support beneath the carton arrangement.

17 points
TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to LucyArcher0393

@LucyArcher0393 Add the complete tool geometry and adjacent cartons at the corner positions. A tool-centre point alone can't establish whether the body or fingers overlap nearby packaging.

5 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to TheoBrown0932

@TheoBrown0932 I've got a useful review basis now: show support and the complete tool on the layer drawings, then have both specialists assess it. That answers my starting question; the pattern itself remains conditional on their findings

9 points
TH
TheoBrown0932
Replying to LucyArcher0393

That gives both reviewers the same concrete arrangement to assess. Pattern acceptance can then follow their findings.

20 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.