No. The first tray had the initial runs; the replacement mainly appears at the later miss. Same sleeve type and reviewed job, but I cannot turn that uneven coverage into a reliability comparison.

Then say improved initial observations, followed by a miss after exchange. Retain both trays for the tooling comparison; no success percentage rescued from unequal scraps.

Tooling has compared them with the locator drawing. The replacement frame is correct, but its insert is seated above its intended shoulder. That explains a presentation difference, not yet why it sits there.

Has maintenance inspected that seating interface before anybody adjusts the locator around it?

Maintenance found a trapped packing strip below the removable insert. Removed through the workshop procedure; the insert now reaches the intended shoulder. Repeat transfer and exchange checks are still to run.

Keep the as-found condition in the report. Useful source finding, but the clean seated insert is not evidence that the whole tray-change sequence has passed.

The update now distinguishes the limited first runs, the later miss and the confirmed seating obstruction. It remains a promising locator change awaiting the reviewed return comparison. Fixed can wait its turn.