Reviewing the recording, I can see consistent seating in the checked fixture before pickup. The workpiece changes angle during gripping rather than arriving in that position.

Preserve the current settings and pause further nudges. Have maintenance inspect finger mounting, contact surfaces and tray seating under the proper isolation procedure, using that observation to guide the checks.

I've checked the maintenance history and found a pad replacement preceding the initial pickup-point correction. That establishes a relevant sequence of changes to investigate.

The timing suggests the replacement is responsible. I'd check whether the pads were installed in the specified configuration.

The sequence makes pad installation worth investigating, but it doesn't establish causation. Fixture variation remains a possible contributor even with that maintenance history.

Agreed, I called it too early. Treat the replacement as a lead; verify installation and contact condition alongside tray location before assigning the cause.

My separate handling setup had both worn gripping surfaces and variation in tray seating. Coordinate corrections alone gave inconsistent results because they didn't address either underlying condition

@YasminAdams0093 How did you keep those two effects apart? Ours already has enough point edits to make the history messy.

We kept a known reference configuration and had maintenance check one condition at a time. We didn't roll back points blindly after finding wear

Why not just go back to the original points once the gripper's checked? Aren't those the good ones?

Only if they match the verified setup. Tooling, frames or presentation may have changed; your responsible technician should compare the configuration before any supervised validation.

@AishaBell0692 The observed rotation gives us an inspection plan: retain the configuration and have maintenance assess tooling and seating before further point changes or trials. I'm keeping attribution to the arm open pending that work.

That answers the inspection-order question. Keeping the arm diagnosis open fits what your observation actually shows.