The rebuilt FR10 laptop imports a copy from the handover folder

NaomiAbbott0071 · 20 Feb 2026, 09:28 UTC

Closed
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Our rebuilt laptop rejects an argument in the read-only connection check, and its imported SDK path points into a handover folder rather than the copy maintenance installed; I can show both paths, but I cannot yet tell which package the working laptop was meant to use

18 replies

FE
FelixBaker0458
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Get the working laptop to report its interpreter and imported module path through its usual launcher. Don't infer them from whichever folder looks newest.

17 points
DA
DavidBaker0519
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Also save the exact rejected call. Argument errors can happen before any controller communication.

17 points
LI
LinAdams0096
Replying to FelixBaker0458

Would comparing the two desktop shortcuts be a cheap place to start, Felix, since that was where our technician hid the interpreter choice?

9 points
FE
FelixBaker0458
Replying to LinAdams0096

Yes, including their working directories. But capture the running process too. A shortcut can launch another script which changes the import path.

-10 points
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Replying to FelixBaker0458

The shortcuts do launch different interpreters, and the working laptop imports from a separate environment, so our supposedly identical folder copy was never the whole setup

11 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Can the person who prepared the handover explain why that spare SDK copy was included, because leaving two plausible copies without a note is a decent way to waste the next person's morning?

1 points
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Replying to NoraAllen0322

He included it as an archive, then the rebuilt shortcut put that archive on the search path; he has owned the mistake and is checking the supported environment against the controller information

18 points
DA
DavidBaker0519
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Archive found. Is the rejected argument actually absent from that copy's signature?

6 points
FE
FelixBaker0458
Replying to DavidBaker0519

And compare the documented call for the intended package. Removing an argument until the error goes away could silently change what the check asks for.

2 points
LI
LinAdams0096
Replying to FelixBaker0458

I nearly suggested exactly that, take the extra bit out and see, but yes I'd want to know what that bit meant first

18 points
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Replying to DavidBaker0519

David, the archived copy does lack that argument, while the intended package and its matching documentation agree with our unchanged call; support has confirmed the intended package for this bench

20 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

What will maintenance receive now, an environment they can restore or another folder called final?

6 points
FE
FelixBaker0458
Replying to NoraAllen0322

A recorded launcher, dependency versions and package origin would be useful. They should be able to reproduce which code runs without knowing this discussion happened.

13 points
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Replying to FelixBaker0458

We have rebuilt the environment from the recorded package, corrected the launcher and moved the archive out of its search path; the argument error is gone, although the actual read-only check still needs its bench slot

14 points
DA
DavidBaker0519
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Thanks for checking the signature, not just the folder name.

16 points
LI
LinAdams0096
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Naomi, does the handover also say which shortcut to use, because two similar desktop icons will undo a surprisingly good explanation?

1 points
NA
NaomiAbbott0071
Replying to LinAdams0096

There is now one labelled maintenance launcher, Lin, and our normal read-only connection check has passed from it with the expected controller identity; a second electrician reproduced the setup from the handover without my old laptop beside him

16 points
FE
FelixBaker0458
Replying to NaomiAbbott0071

Good. The second electrician reproducing it is the part I'd want in the handover acceptance, not merely your successful run.

6 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .