We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it.

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

Don't let simpler sound like approved. An unrotated layer still needs its load and stability assessed with the actual contents.

@SarahAdams0154 You're right to qualify the suggestion. I intended an alternative for comparison, with both patterns requiring packaging assessment of support and stability using the specified filled cartons.

@OwenBaker0486 I thought alternating layers always made a stronger stack. Is that too simple?

Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

The layer overlay shows carton edges above gaps below. That gives me something specific to mark for packaging instead of saying the pattern feels wrong.

On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin.

@HanaChan1057 Specify the deck arrangement as well as the footprint. Two pallets with the same outside size needn't provide the same support underneath.

@HanaChan1057 For access, show the whole tool beside neighbouring cartons at the corner placements. The centre mark won't reveal body or finger overlap.

@OwenBaker0486 The tool outline overlaps the next carton at one corner in our offline layout. Lovely rectangles, inconvenient gripper. I'll flag that position for the integrator.

Include approach and release, not just the final pose. Clearing the outline at the destination wouldn't establish access to it.

@SarahAdams0154 I'll keep that review offline and include every layer. I'm not going to explore the corner with manual jogging.

I'm holding the pattern decision. A neat footprint doesn't establish the packaging support and tool access our cell needs.

@HanaChan1057 Understood. The footprint alone hasn't answered either requirement strongly enough to close your decision.