Our FR5 mounting plate has a boss the approved drawing never showed

RobinBaker0512 · 13 Dec 2025, 23:56 UTC

Closed
RO
RobinBaker0512
Delivered FR5 has a raised boss behind our proposed adapter. Approved drawing shows a flat plate. Tooling unfitted.

15 replies

OW
OwenAli0225
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Which assembly carries the difference, Robin: the arm interface itself or an added mounting plate? I would not infer that from the changed label suffix alone.

8 points
RO
RobinBaker0512
Replying to OwenAli0225

Added plate appears different. Arm suffix changed too. Seller just says equivalent, with no assembly comparison.

15 points
NO
NoraAdams0148
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Send the approved drawing revision with photographs identifying the delivered plate and its markings. Ask the technical contact to explain the difference before anyone modifies your adapter.

8 points
JA
JackAllen0341
Replying to RobinBaker0512

We once spent a call discussing the arm when the package builder had changed a separate plate. An overview and a close view together helped. One beautifully cropped photograph left the important boundary out.

2 points
EL
ElenaAli0253
Replying to JackAllen0341

Jack, yes. Also ask for the supplied plate drawing. Robin can describe a boss without knowing every functional difference hidden behind it.

12 points
RO
RobinBaker0512
Replying to ElenaAli0253

Asked for that drawing and a comparison against revision C, which the seller approved before purchase.

10 points
JE
Jeremy_Bailey
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Don't settle for another distant demonstration either. My seller's video managed to hide the tool at every useful moment. Your actual mounting detail needs to stay identifiable if they use a video to explain the change.

1 points
CA
CalebBaker0493
Replying to RobinBaker0512

And if their answer is a different adapter, include the changed tool position in the review. Making the holes agree isn't the whole job

19 points
OW
OwenAli0225
Replying to CalebBaker0493

Caleb, Robin should also get the option of supplying what was agreed. We are getting quite comfortable designing around their substitution before they have explained it.

21 points
EL
ElenaAli0253
Replying to OwenAli0225

Agreed with Owen. Compare the original route and any proposed alternative, including who pays for the design and checks. Neither route is accepted just because someone can draw it.

20 points
RO
RobinBaker0512
Replying to OwenAli0225

Original plate requested. Seller says unavailable now. Their technician confirms the delivered plate changes the adapter stand-off.

17 points
NO
NoraAdams0148
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Then keep that stand-off in the load and access assessment for any alternative. The old checks describe the old arrangement, even if the same fingers can be reused.

16 points
JA
JackAllen0341
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Have they provided the drawing now, Robin, or just the explanation about stand-off? I'd want your installer working from the same defined assembly as their technician.

7 points
RO
RobinBaker0512
Replying to JackAllen0341

Drawing supplied. Installer is comparing it with the approved assembly. No agreement to alter our adapter or accept substitution.

8 points
CA
CalebBaker0493
Replying to RobinBaker0512

Who would own the revised assembly and spares details if the alternative is chosen? Installer and supplier need the same answer before this becomes their favourite thing to refer back to each other

1 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .