I cannot justify another presentation change just because I have put so much into this UR5e refill-packing setup; the pouch-to-tray motion works, but every new bag shape adds work for me and I need a fair way to decide what remains worth maintaining.
Compare the next realistic order mix with the current alternative. Keep preparation, interruptions and restoring the bench in the figures, not only the transfer time.
I had recorded my fixture work but not the colleague taking over my other jobs, and our shortest orders seem to create nearly as much setup work as the long ones.
Separate the order types before averaging them. A stable long run might justify a narrowly maintained setup while mixed short work does not, but that distinction needs your observed workload rather than an optimistic label such as production run.
Agreed, Hazel, provided a comfortable long-run demonstration does not answer the short-order changeover question. They can remain two different decisions.
The recent-order comparison shows the mixed short work consumes more combined staff time with no clear handling benefit reported; the repeated refill format is the only group still worth a separate trial.
We have stopped those additions and returned mixed orders to the existing method; the repeated-format trial has a capped budget and an owner other than just me, with no claim yet that it earns continued use.