the refill transfer works but I am still its presentation department

GeorgiaChambers · 21 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC

Reply to discussion
GE
GeorgiaChambers
I cannot justify another presentation change just because I have put so much into this UR5e refill-packing setup; the pouch-to-tray motion works, but every new bag shape adds work for me and I need a fair way to decide what remains worth maintaining.

9 replies

HA
HazelAdams0136
Replying to GeorgiaChambers

Compare the next realistic order mix with the current alternative. Keep preparation, interruptions and restoring the bench in the figures, not only the transfer time.

4 points
CA
CarlaBrown0923
Replying to HazelAdams0136

Include the person covering you while you work on presentation. That effort is part of the process even when it happens at a different bench.

25 points
GE
GeorgiaChambers
Replying to CarlaBrown0923

I had recorded my fixture work but not the colleague taking over my other jobs, and our shortest orders seem to create nearly as much setup work as the long ones.

14 points
JO
JoBrooks0853
Replying to GeorgiaChambers

Separate the order types before averaging them. A stable long run might justify a narrowly maintained setup while mixed short work does not, but that distinction needs your observed workload rather than an optimistic label such as production run.

12 points
HA
HazelAdams0136
Replying to JoBrooks0853

Also include any handling benefit you can actually observe. Time matters, but it need not be the only reason for a bounded application.

22 points
CA
CarlaBrown0923
Replying to HazelAdams0136

Agreed, Hazel, provided a comfortable long-run demonstration does not answer the short-order changeover question. They can remain two different decisions.

22 points
GE
GeorgiaChambers
Replying to JoBrooks0853

The recent-order comparison shows the mixed short work consumes more combined staff time with no clear handling benefit reported; the repeated refill format is the only group still worth a separate trial.

-3 points
JO
JoBrooks0853
Replying to GeorgiaChambers

Have you stopped adding presentation parts for the mixed orders, or is the comparison still only a report?

9 points
GE
GeorgiaChambers
Replying to JoBrooks0853

We have stopped those additions and returned mixed orders to the existing method; the repeated-format trial has a capped budget and an owner other than just me, with no claim yet that it earns continued use.

12 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.