The layer pattern fits, but some cartons sit over gaps

ChloeBell0657 · 13 Aug 2026, 01:35 UTC

Reply to discussion
CH
ChloeBell0657
Our plan for planning alternating carton layers on a pallet with Fairino FR10 in a workshop packing department has a very neat alternating layer drawing. But a sealed corrugated shipping carton has a preferred support direction, and some rotated cartons sit over gaps. I want packaging support and tool access reviewed together before I accept the pattern. Where should I start?

13 replies

ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to ChloeBell0657

Does your layer drawing show the load-bearing carton edges and pallet deck beneath them? Add those, then overlay the complete gripper outline.

7 points
CH
ChloeBell0657
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it.

-2 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to ChloeBell0657

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

15 points
LO
LouisCarter1007
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

The repeated arrangement remains a candidate, not an accepted solution. Its support and load stability still need assessment for the cartons with their actual contents.

3 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to LouisCarter1007

@LouisCarter1007 Agreed; I meant a comparison option. Packaging must assess both arrangements with the specified cartons and contents, including support and stability.

5 points
HA
HazelAli0223
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

@MeiBarnes0603 I thought alternating layers always made a stronger stack. Is that too simple?

22 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to HazelAli0223

That rule is too broad because changing the pattern changes the load paths. The packaging reviewer needs the carton construction and support geometry to assess the result.

6 points
CH
ChloeBell0657
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

@MeiBarnes0603 The layer overlay shows carton edges above gaps below. That gives me something specific to mark for packaging instead of saying the pattern feels wrong.

8 points
HA
HazelAdams0136
Replying to ChloeBell0657

@ChloeBell0657 On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

5 points
CH
ChloeBell0657
Replying to HazelAdams0136

Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin.

13 points
HA
HazelAdams0136
Replying to ChloeBell0657

Include the deck geometry in the pattern's pallet reference. Matching overall dimensions don't establish identical support beneath the carton arrangement.

5 points
CH
ChloeBell0657
Replying to HazelAdams0136

I'm holding the pattern decision. A neat footprint doesn't establish the packaging support and tool access our cell needs.

2 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to ChloeBell0657

Understood. The footprint alone hasn't answered either requirement strongly enough to close your decision.

2 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.