Which pallet view connects our UR5e finger gaps to carton support?

EllaBell0642 · 6 Dec 2025, 00:07 UTC

Closed
EL
EllaBell0642
I have the packed-carton identity attached to our UR5e pattern review. The turned row still puts its support strips over gaps. The top view hides that, and neither supplier has supplied a section through both layers.

10 replies

VI
VictorChen1142
Replying to EllaBell0642

Ask for a section through the affected positions with the lower layer, pallet deck and finger withdrawal shown. Both teams should mark their decisions against the same carton construction and pattern revision.

15 points
EL
EllaBell0642
Replying to VictorChen1142

The integrator will own the combined section. Packaging has current samples; the tool supplier has the earlier construction drawing. Same external size, different internal support.

5 points
RO
RosaChan1075
Replying to EllaBell0642

That kind of mismatch cost us time on a delivery review because everybody thought the familiar description identified the contents. Send the tool supplier the current construction and get it acknowledged before combining comments.

18 points
RE
RebeccaChan1126
Replying to EllaBell0642

Is any old-construction stock still being packed, Ella? If it is, replacing the drawing alone could erase a real second operating case.

-1 points
EL
EllaBell0642
Replying to RebeccaChan1126

No old stock remains. Packaging confirms the current construction is the only one now supplied. I've sent that confirmation with the drawing.

5 points
VI
VictorChen1142
Replying to EllaBell0642

Then make that scope explicit in the proposal and receiving instructions, so the shared outside dimensions don't bring the old assumption back later.

12 points
RE
RebeccaChan1126
Replying to EllaBell0642

And check a current packed sample beside the section when it returns. Cheap way to catch a copied support line before people spend another meeting approving it.

9 points
EL
EllaBell0642
Replying to RebeccaChan1126

The tool supplier has acknowledged the current construction. The revised section is requested, not returned. The original full-pallet count stays provisional.

7 points
RO
RosaChan1075
Replying to EllaBell0642

Thanks for keeping that distinction. Does the request include any proposed sheet, or is the current option relying directly on the cartons and pallet?

0 points
EL
EllaBell0642
Replying to RosaChan1075

Direct carton and pallet support only in this option. No sheet proposed. If that changes, its construction and handling will need adding to the same review.

5 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .