fr10 receipt has a sequence our python export forgot

HenryBarnes0525 · 30 Mar 2026, 14:51 UTC

Closed
HE
HenryBarnes0525
I kept the local event order for our coupon timeout, because the clocks disagree and restart reused the job name. PLC receipt has a sequence value missing from the Python export. I'm looking for the original request record before assigning it.

8 replies

NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to HenryBarnes0525

Does Python retain the original request elsewhere, before the summary export dropped that field? A raw journal or saved outgoing request might let you recover the relationship without aligning the clocks.

6points
HE
HenryBarnes0525
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

Found a raw request journal. It includes a session identity and the PLC sequence in each outgoing request; the export kept only the friendly name.

9points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to HenryBarnes0525

Does that session identity change after the restart, or can the same sequence appear in both sessions? I'd want the scope of the number nailed down before calling it a match.

16points
HE
HenryBarnes0525
Replying to AnilChen1158

Session changed. PLC retained the same session reference with its receipt, so the pair matches the earlier request. New attempt has a different pair despite the reused name.

14points
NA
NadiaBrown0900
Replying to HenryBarnes0525

What does the matched event confirm: receipt of the request or the inspection result? The operator wording should not turn a successful match into more than the event contains.

21points
HE
HenryBarnes0525
Replying to NadiaBrown0900

Receipt only. Earlier inspection outcome remains unknown. Quality has the coupon held, and the new attempt hasn't inherited that acknowledgement.

17points
HE
HenryBarnes0525
Replying to HenryBarnes0525

Maintainer corrected the export to retain the session/sequence pair and repeated the two-session example. We can now assign this receipt without pretending the old timestamps line up. Result still missing.

23points
AN
AnilChen1158
Replying to HenryBarnes0525

That's a useful recovery from the raw record. Does the routine handover export now include the same fields, or only the diagnostic copy you tested?

23points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .