Can't accept a pallet pattern with the support left blank

ZaraBrown0917 · 3 Jun 2025, 16:28 UTC

Closed
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
I'm reviewing a separate FR10 dispatch proposal. Again, rotated cartons over gaps. This time the tool supplier wants gaps even wider. I can't accept the pattern while packaging and tooling review different drawings.

7 replies

LU
LucaCarter0961
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Get them on one drawing first. Could you put the actual loaded carton construction over the proposed lower layer, with the fingers drawn where they open? Cheap way to make the disagreement visible.

14 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to LucaCarter0961

Done. Packaging dislikes the unsupported end of the rotated carton. Tooling says narrowing that gap traps the fingers. Both are now pointing at the same bit.

4 points
LU
LucaCarter0961
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Could a different layer count or orientation leave that end supported? I'd ask before getting attached to this exact pattern, even if it loses a few cartons.

8 points
SO
SofiaBaker0456
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Does dispatch have a minimum quantity per pallet, or is the current count just convenient?

9 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to SofiaBaker0456

Not a customer requirement. Dispatch chose it from the old manual pattern. They'd consider fewer cartons, but want to know what happens to handling cost.

18 points
SO
SofiaBaker0456
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Then compare the lower-count option too, with packaging's support check included in the cost discussion.

5 points
LU
LucaCarter0961
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

And leave room for the pallet truck. We nearly blocked our own collection route making a pattern fit the footprint. Not saying yours does, just worth drawing before everyone agrees.

17 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .