I wrote that our little enclosure transfer was 'straightforward to get running', which is an impressive claim from someone who arrived after the fixture and tray were ready. I did run the prepared UR5e exercise under supervision and liked it. How much should I rewrite when the experience was real but the credit wandered off in my direction?
I can't decide how much of my UR5e review needs rewriting
GabrielChen1149 · 15 Jan 2026, 06:24 UTC
16 replies
Replying to GabrielChen1149
Replace the setup claim with what you actually did. You can still say the prepared exercise felt straightforward, with the supervision mentioned alongside it.
22pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
Put the correction where readers will see it. Editing the middle quietly won't help someone who already repeated your setup claim to their manager.
19pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
What did you have to do when an enclosure wasn't sitting properly?
22pointsReplying to MeiBrooks0864
MeiBrooks, I called the demonstrator over and he checked the seating before we continued, so that goes in; Val, yes, I'll flag the correction at the top rather than pretending the original wording never existed.
8pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
Was the enclosure already the right way round when it reached you? That's the bit I'd want to know as a reader. A nice prepared tray can hide quite a lot of sorting.
25pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
I don't mind a happy first-impressions post. Sometimes I just want to know whether somebody enjoyed a session, not whether they have written a purchasing specification. But tell me it was a session, please. Otherwise I start imagining my untidy bench in place of their prepared one.
9pointsReplying to RosaAllen0292
Rosa, I agree enjoyment is worth reporting, but 'straightforward to get running' is a setup claim. The correction matters even in a personal review.
16pointsReplying to OwenAbbott0051
Yep, we're agreeing on that phrase. I meant don't sand all the enthusiasm off with it.
3pointsReplying to EllaChen1164
Ella's sorting question is useful. I'd also say who prepared the enclosure tray. Not because every review needs a time study, but because that's a job somebody has to do.
8pointsReplying to MeiArcher0429
Ella and MeiArcher, the demonstrator supplied the sorted tray as well, and I only refilled it from his arranged row of enclosures. I've posted the correction now with that detail and the seating interruption. Still says I had a good afternoon. That part wasn't fabricated.
12pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
Does it still say you 'programmed the transfer'? You selected the prepared exercise, from what you've described.
19pointsReplying to Val_Blair
Oof, yes, in the caption. Changed that to selecting the prepared exercise. Thank you, Val; I'd reread the paragraphs three times and skipped my own photo caption.
12pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
Captions get read first. Annoyingly good catch.
21pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
The seating interruption is the most useful bit to me. It shows where you needed help without guessing whether you'd manage alone after training.
16pointsReplying to GabrielChen1149
Did you get another chance to load it after the demonstrator checked the seat, or was that the end of the session? Curious how much of the handling you actually repeated.
8pointsReplying to Val_Blair
Val has made me check an old workshop photo caption of mine. Apparently I 'built' a fixture someone had already drilled and assembled. I fitted one stop. Small correction going in there too.
19pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .