Our planned presenting reflective components for surface inspection in a robot-presented camera station has Fairino FR5 presenting a bright-finished enclosure faceplate to a fixed camera.
The example images contain bright streaks that shift with small presentation differences, yet those streaks are being labelled as scratches.
Before commissioning, I'd like to establish reliable references and image conditions for threshold tuning.
Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result
@AlexArcher0385 I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular.
Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects
Retain their sample identities and undecided status. They shouldn't become confirmed acceptable or defective examples while the physical review remains unresolved
@AlexArcher0385 I've checked the image folders and found that exposure and presentation both changed between them. Their improved appearance can't be attributed to either change individually.