Neither defined nor priced. The supplier's proposal refers to the final accepted bracket, with no description of the correction behind it

Then final acceptance is evidence about corrected work, not necessarily the fixture's released output.

Same drawing revision, batch heading only. The restrained check says aligned, with no numerical reading to pair with the released dimensions

I'd have the historical route drawn as separate stages with those gaps visible, because an operator learning the new process could otherwise be told that a fixture alignment tick means the finished bracket meets the drawing.

Who can explain the support used for the released measurement?

The fixture sketch alone may not describe that support. Worth checking the inspection method separately.

Quality is looking for the released-check method. I've kept incoming fit-up, restrained location, released check and post-correction acceptance separate in the review index

Does that index name the missing incoming measurements as missing, rather than imply the first recorded check describes the loose components?

Yes, incoming condition is explicitly unknown. The clearer index hasn't filled any gaps or established a correction method for the proposed cell