Reviewing the recording, I can see consistent seating in the checked fixture before pickup. The workpiece changes angle during gripping rather than arriving in that position.

Keep a copy of the current configuration and hold off on further coordinate changes. Under the appropriate isolation procedure, maintenance can use the observed rotation to focus inspection on tooling contact, mounting and tray seating.

The maintenance notes show contact pads were replaced before the first point adjustment. That's the first useful clue I've found in the history.

@EmmaChen1159 The timing suggests the replacement is responsible. I'd check whether the pads were installed in the specified configuration.

Timing isn't enough to call it the cause. Check the pads, yes, but don't let one maintenance entry explain away fixture variation.

You're right; the history supports a check, not a conclusion. Inspect the pad installation and gripping surfaces while retaining tray location in the investigation.

@SarahAllen0328 My separate handling setup had both worn gripping surfaces and variation in tray seating. Coordinate corrections alone gave inconsistent results because they didn't address either underlying condition.

With multiple point changes already in our history, I'm unsure how to distinguish tooling and tray effects. How did you structure that comparison on your setup?

We kept a known reference configuration and had maintenance check one condition at a time. We didn't roll back points blindly after finding wear.

@FelixAdams0110 Why not just go back to the original points once the gripper's checked? Aren't those the good ones?