I've got support and occupied withdrawal on the UR5e review request, but the labelled cartons still rotate over gaps. How do I keep the actual packed-box requirements tied to the tooling comparison?
Identify the carton and internal packing revision beside the bearing requirements on the shared layer view. The label and outside dimensions alone may not identify the load arrangement packaging assessed.
I found the layout and packing sheet refer to different internal inserts despite the same carton code. Packaging is checking which packed version is intended for dispatch before judging the rotated positions.
That explains the conflicting inputs, not whether either packed version can use the pattern. Keep the selected version explicit when the bearing assessment arrives.
Dispatch confirmed the current insert, and the common drawing now names it. Bearing and complete withdrawal assessments are still pending; I've withdrawn the older support note from this proposal.