Our FR5 faceplate references are now quality-checked, but the printed cards still show the old guessed streak labels; how should I handle the training gap while the revised imaging arrangement is being compared?
Withdraw the cards that teach the wrong decisions and tell the trainer why. Keep the current method clearly defined. Don't replace them with trial pictures that look better but haven't been accepted for the lesson yet.
The old cards are withdrawn and the trainer has the quality decisions beside the retained samples; the new holder and lighting comparison is still open, so no replacement camera cards have been issued.
Can the trainer use those samples to explain the physical decisions without implying the camera setup is ready? We've had that distinction help: what makes a part unacceptable can be taught while the proposed image method still needs work.
Yes, physical examples can be taught using quality's agreed method; the proposed automated check stays out of the practical lesson until its presentation and images are accepted.
Make sure the person covering the trainer knows that too. A missing set of cards can look like an admin problem, and somebody may kindly print the old version to keep the session moving.
Have the old files been marked withdrawn where people download them? Taking paper off the bench helps, but it won't stop the next well-meaning reprint by itself.