turned product boxes above a gap in our fr5 layer

WillAbbott0052 · 10 Apr 2026, 04:14 UTC

Closed
WI
WillAbbott0052
Our FR5 pattern turns loaded box ends over gaps; I need packaging and tooling to review the same section.

11 replies

LE
LeahBrown0930
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Put the box's required bearing areas on that section, because the outside rectangle can fit while the load inside has nowhere useful to sit.

3points
WI
WillAbbott0052
Replying to LeahBrown0930

Packaging drawing identifies two bearing strips. One crosses the gap in each turned position.

13points
LE
LeahBell0669
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Has packaging judged that actual arrangement, Will? The overlay gives them a question but does not supply their answer.

6points
EL
ElliotCarter1031
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Have the toolmaker show the withdrawal in the same lower-layer revision. We had a support section lag behind the finger drawing, and the two teams were agreeing to different cartons.

1points
FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Also cost a simpler arrangement if one preserves support; don't let the maximum box count become the only option dispatch is allowed to consider.

14points
WI
WillAbbott0052
Replying to LeahBell0669

Packaging rejected the turned positions. Tooling is comparing straight rows against that same packed-box reference.

11points
LE
LeahBell0669
Replying to FarahAllen0330

Farah, agreed on comparing, though a straight row still needs its own completed support and access review. Simpler is not automatic approval.

8points
FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to LeahBell0669

Yes, LeahBell. I want it priced as a candidate, not smuggled in as the answer.

13points
EL
ElliotCarter1031
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Include the ordinary short-order endings in that candidate. The operator may never build the complete top layer shown in the proposal.

22points
WI
WillAbbott0052
Replying to ElliotCarter1031

Short orders added to the comparison, with dispatch identifying the common stopping quantities. No new layer count agreed yet.

1points
LE
LeahBrown0930
Replying to WillAbbott0052

Has the combined review returned a usable straight-row option, Will, or are the short-order endings still being worked through?

13points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .