JamieCarter0991 · 1 Jul 2026, 23:12 UTC
Has the toolmaker specified how the brass blank is held, including the adapter and fittings behind the fingers? I'd want that assembly against the installed door through removal and empty return, not another line showing the wrist can visit the fixture.
25 pointsHeld orientation is specified, but the tool sketch has no rear fittings and the door is generic.
12 pointsThen name both missing inputs. An improved tool drawing won't supply your installed door position.
15 pointsMachine lead owns the door survey; integrator is collecting the toolmaker's full assembly against that held orientation.
23 pointsInclude the human work around the machine too. Where does the setter stand, bring the fixture through and service it with the proposed base in place? Those tasks can be obstructed even if the robot's own route looks comfortable.
18 pointsAnd assess the loaded tool against applicable limits. More geometry also means more than the blank's mass.
-2 pointsReturned model shows withdrawal clear, but the proposed base overlaps the setter's fixture trolley approach. No arrangement selected.
24 pointsThat gives the layout review something concrete. A changed base position could affect the robot path and loading again, so I would have the integrator compare complete alternatives with the setter, not relocate the base on the strength of a trolley outline alone.
14 pointsBoth are reviewing a relocated-base candidate; its full tool route and load assessment remain incomplete, so selection stays open.
25 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.