Both quotes for loading our machined aluminium housings into inspection nests argue suitability from part mass alone. The FR10 would carry extended fingers, an adapter and hose fittings too. What complete assessment should I request before purchasing treats these as usable alternatives?
Request each complete loaded assembly's mass, centre of gravity and relevant inertia, with the held position and intended motion assessed against the applicable robot and tooling limits. Include the service arrangement and release task; part mass alone cannot establish either proposal's suitability.