Fairino FR10: What counts as a confirmed defect on a reflective surface?

AlexBrooks0820 · 4 Sept 2026, 04:10 UTC

Reply to discussion
AL
AlexBrooks0820
Our planned presenting reflective components for surface inspection in a robot-presented camera station has Fairino FR10 presenting a polished metal cover to a fixed camera. The example images contain bright streaks that shift with small presentation differences, yet those streaks are being labelled as scratches. Before commissioning, I'd like to establish reliable references and image conditions for threshold tuning.

3 replies

RO
RosaChen1162
Replying to AlexBrooks0820

Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result.

20 points
AL
AlexBrooks0820
Replying to RosaChen1162

@RosaChen1162 I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular.

21 points
RO
RosaChen1162
Replying to AlexBrooks0820

Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects.

5 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.