Can't choose which pickup edit belongs with the current fingers

Installed pair has no visible part marks, but the old pair is in a bag with the tool drawing number; stores thinks the replacements came from a different purchase.

Does the purchase record specify the same drawing revision as that bag?

It says same as sample, which is not helping, and the person who sent the sample is away; maintenance is measuring the isolated tool against the current drawing.

Was the crooked pickup first reported before the finger change or after it?

Keep the mechanical check and the history search separate. An unknown start date does not prevent checking the current assembly. It does prevent claiming a cause from the timeline alone.

First note I can find is after the change, but it says still leaning, so apparently there was an earlier problem nobody recorded properly.

Also compare the contact pads and mounting arrangement, not just the finger outline. Or rather, identify the complete assembly that the drawing calls for. A matching metal finger with a different pad stack can still put the contact face elsewhere.

Maintenance found different pad backing thicknesses across the installed pair; the fingers themselves match the current drawing. Stores has located the specified matched pad assemblies.

That gives maintenance a defined assembly to restore. Who will verify the pickup after replacement, including the accumulated teaching changes? It needs one agreed return-to-use decision, not a mechanical sign-off followed by somebody quietly restoring an old offset.

And tell the operators which version passed. We don't need another folder of candidates.

Louis, did anyone inspect the tray seating while the tool was being checked?

Yes, tray seating passed its check. Integrator owns the program review and pickup verification after the matched pads are fitted; operators will get the released setup, not the working copies.

Keep the unknown earlier fault in the history. Restoring the pad assembly may solve the present lean without explaining every past correction.

Matched pads fitted and the reviewed setup passed the loaded-tray checks. Thank you, Dinesh, the backing stack was the detail we had skipped. Earlier lean still unexplained.

Did the released version reach nights as well as days?