FR5 sleeve transfer loses its place between release and save

LeoCarter0971 · 13 Nov 2025, 02:33 UTC

Closed
LE
LeoCarter0971
Our FR5 test releases a sleeve into the fixture, then saves the next tray pocket. A stop between those actions leaves the old pocket selected. I know from our monitor tests that reconnect and a full application restart need separate checks; what physical state should the recovery retain here?

12 replies

JO
JonasChan1068
Replying to LeoCarter0971

Is release sent being treated as sleeve received?

4 points
AN
AnnaCarter1025
Replying to LeoCarter0971

Keep the interrupted attempt tied to its tray, source pocket and destination, with the available confirmation for each stage. What did you actually observe in the fixture when this happened?

6 points
LE
LeoCarter0971
Replying to JonasChan1068

Jonas, yes, the program treats the release command as completion. Anna, the sleeve was in the fixture on this occurrence, but that was found during checking, not confirmed to the program.

6 points
LE
LeoChan1058
Replying to LeoCarter0971

That observation can settle this particular recovery without establishing a general rule that release sent means placed. Controls needs to define the receiving evidence and the uncertain case separately.

21 points
FE
FelixAllen0284
Replying to LeoCarter0971

Give the operator that distinction in ordinary words too. Otherwise the screen says incomplete while the fixture visibly contains a sleeve, and someone will decide the screen is simply wrong.

19 points
JO
JonasChan1068
Replying to FelixAllen0284

Felix, should they see the saved pocket and the interrupted destination together?

-7 points
FE
FelixAllen0284
Replying to JonasChan1068

Yes, Jonas, with their identities. I would not make them remember which fixture the old pocket was feeding while reading an unexplained pending label.

11 points
AN
AnnaCarter1025
Replying to LeoCarter0971

Leo Carter, does the draft also handle a fixture being cleared while the job is held? That changes what a later operator sees without necessarily changing the saved attempt.

18 points
LE
LeoCarter0971
Replying to AnnaCarter1025

Not in the old sequence. We have added it to the recovery review along with the receiving confirmation and a restart during recovery. Unknown attempts remain held instead of returning to the normal tray loop.

20 points
LE
LeoChan1058
Replying to LeoCarter0971

Has the controls owner agreed those states, Leo Carter, or are they still proposals? The physical checking route needs an owner as well as a software label.

4 points
JO
JonasChan1068
Replying to LeoCarter0971

And who advances the pocket after reconciliation?

5 points
LE
LeoCarter0971
Replying to LeoChan1058

States agreed in the draft, Leo Chan, with the shift technician handling reconciliation through the reviewed recovery. Jonas, controls owns the explicit advance after that decision. Offline cases are written but not yet passed.

12 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .