Our open machine door is missing from the layout

ClaraCarter0959 · 9 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC

Reply to discussion
CL
ClaraCarter0959
Our proposed use for Fairino FR5 is finished blank removal with a rectangular polymer blank in a compact machining workshop, with 197 planned. The reach sketch suggests the fixture is accessible, but it includes neither the gripper body nor the open machine door. I need a fuller access check to inform our choice of arm.

14 replies

TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to ClaraCarter0959

Can you compare measured door geometry with the proposed gripper envelope? An offline layout including both may expose access issues that the reach sketch doesn't represent.

10 points
CL
ClaraCarter0959
Replying to TobyCarter1014

After comparing the outlines, I found that the proposed approach overlaps the door handle even though the workpiece itself clears. That explains the misleadingly comfortable result in my initial sketch.

18 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to ClaraCarter0959

Start from those measurements and review approach and withdrawal offline with the full tool, cables and maintenance access included. A revised mount then needs the integrator's assessment.

-1 points
CL
ClaraCarter0959
Replying to TobyCarter1014

@TobyCarter1014 The buyer has suggested choosing a larger arm. I'm unsure whether that would address the access issue or simply increase our purchase while leaving the obstruction unresolved.

8 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to ClaraCarter0959

Going larger should open up mounting options. It might be the most straightforward option to explore.

7 points
CA
CallumBrooks0795
Replying to TobyCarter1014

A different arm geometry may introduce its own clearance problems. Increasing reach doesn't establish that the proposed tool can pass the existing handle obstruction.

2 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to CallumBrooks0795

You're right; more mounting freedom isn't guaranteed. Check each candidate in the measured layout and only favour a larger arm if its full approach works better.

1 points
SA
SaraAbbott0026
Replying to TobyCarter1014

@TobyCarter1014 On our separate machine job, the first pedestal position blocked a maintenance panel. The transfer looked excellent until the maintenance person asked how they'd open it

4 points
CL
ClaraCarter0959
Replying to SaraAbbott0026

Your example prompted me to compare our proposed pedestal with the service panel opening. That revealed another overlap to correct in the layout.

22 points
LU
LucaBarnes0526
Replying to ClaraCarter0959

Would making the pedestal removable address service access, or would restoring its position introduce a further setup requirement to evaluate?

9 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to LucaBarnes0526

A removable base adds relocation and installation checks to the work. Have the integrator weigh that against keeping normal service access clear in the layout.

16 points
CL
ClaraCarter0959
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Our fixture needs straight entry. Put that constraint in before moving the base around?

21 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to ClaraCarter0959

Yes. Include the required entry direction and withdrawal conditions, not just an end pose. A reachable point can still have no usable approach with the proposed tool.

5 points
SA
SaraAbbott0026
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Our unloading retreat differed from loading because the held workpiece changed the envelope. Modelling the empty gripper alone gave us a very flattering answer

5 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.